What is Uber's new women-only feature in US, and why is it being challenged in court? Here's eligibility a

The Economic Times
Uber launched a women-only ride option in the US, but it faces a lawsuit alleging sex-based discrimination.

Summary

Uber has introduced a new feature in the United States allowing women riders and drivers to be matched with each other, aiming to address safety concerns reported by users. This option, available nationwide through the Uber app, allows riders to request women drivers or set a preference for them, while drivers can choose to accept trips from female riders. However, the feature has sparked a class action lawsuit in California, with two Uber drivers claiming it violates laws prohibiting sex discrimination and potentially gives female drivers an unfair advantage. The lawsuit argues the feature reinforces stereotypes about men being more dangerous. Uber defends the feature as supporting public safety goals and has requested the dispute be moved to arbitration.

The feature operates through two main mechanisms: a “Women Drivers” option for riders to directly request a female driver, and a preference setting for riders to increase their chances of being matched with a woman driver. Drivers can also activate a preference to receive trip requests from female riders. Uber initially tested the feature in several cities before its nationwide rollout, and similar options exist in approximately 40 countries, including Saudi Arabia, Canada, and Mexico.

Despite consultations with women’s safety groups and LGBTQ organizations, the feature is currently limited to riders and drivers who identify as women, excluding nonbinary individuals. The eligibility criteria for drivers are based on the gender listed on their driver’s license, which may pose challenges for transgender women depending on state regulations. Uber has faced past safety concerns and numerous reports of sexual assault involving riders and drivers, including a recent $8.5 million jury verdict in a sexual assault case.

(Source:The Economic Times)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement