Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase, absolves him of some fraud claims

The Philadelphia Inquirer
A jury found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors about Twitter's bot count before his acquisition, but cleared him of intentionally scheming to defraud them.

Summary

A San Francisco jury has determined that Elon Musk misled investors regarding Twitter’s (now X) stock price in the months leading up to his $44 billion acquisition in 2022. The civil trial revolved around claims that Musk’s tweets and podcast comments in May 2022 intentionally defrauded shareholders who sold their stock based on his statements. While the jury found Musk liable for misleading investors with two specific tweets – including one stating the deal was “temporarily on hold” – they did not find evidence of intentional fraud or a “scheme” to mislead, absolving him of some allegations related to a podcast statement.

The core of the dispute centered on Musk’s assertions about the prevalence of bot accounts on Twitter. He claimed the platform had a significantly higher percentage of fake and spam accounts than the 5% disclosed in regulatory filings, using this as justification to initially attempt to withdraw from the purchase agreement. Twitter subsequently sued to enforce the original deal, but Musk ultimately reversed course and completed the acquisition.

The financial implications of the verdict remain unclear as it is a class-action lawsuit, but damages are expected to reach billions of dollars, distributed among thousands of shareholders, including institutional investors. The jury awarded shareholders between $3 and $8 per stock per day. Despite the potential payout, Musk’s current net worth, estimated at $814 billion, largely tied to Tesla shares, suggests the financial impact will be manageable.

(Source:The Philadelphia Inquirer)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement