New lawsuit says Costco raised its prices in response to tariffs – and wants to keep tariff refunds for itself

The Independent
A class action lawsuit alleges Costco profited from tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court and isn't refunding customers.

Summary

A new class action lawsuit accuses Costco of unjustly profiting from tariffs that were later deemed unlawful by the Supreme Court. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, claims Costco raised prices on imported goods between February 2025 and February 2026 to cover the cost of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Now that the Supreme Court has ruled those tariffs unlawful and businesses are eligible for refunds, the plaintiffs allege Costco intends to keep the refunded money rather than reimburse the customers who initially paid the inflated prices.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs argue that Costco CEO Ron Vachris’s plan to use the refunds for future price cuts does not adequately compensate those who bore the financial burden of the tariffs. They contend this constitutes “unjust enrichment,” as Costco is pursuing its own litigation to recover the duties without promising to redistribute the funds to affected customers. Evidence supporting the claim includes Costco’s own statements during earnings calls acknowledging the impact of tariffs on pricing, and the fact that prices were lowered on some items when tariff pressures eased.

The lawsuit seeks to cover all U.S. shoppers who purchased goods subject to the tariffs at Costco during the relevant period. As of the time of this report, Costco has not yet issued a formal comment on the litigation.

(Source:The Independent)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement