Colgate must face lawsuit over mouthwash safety for kids, judge rules

The Independent
A judge ruled that Colgate-Palmolive must face lawsuits alleging misleading claims about the safety of its fluoride mouthwash for young children.

Summary

A U.S. District Judge has allowed two class-action lawsuits against Colgate-Palmolive to proceed, accusing the company of misleading parents regarding the suitability of its fluoride mouthwashes for young children. Judge Andrea Wood distinguished between mouthwash and toothpaste, stating it’s less obvious to consumers whether mouthwash is appropriate for children and how much is safe to use, especially given packaging featuring terms like “kids” and flavors like “Bubble Fruit.” The judge was unconvinced by Colgate’s argument that consumers would check warning labels on the back of the bottles.

This ruling follows similar lawsuits against Procter & Gamble, Perrigo, and Sanofi concerning fluoride product packaging. Colgate previously agreed to redesign packaging for its toothpaste brands following an investigation by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The cases arise amidst ongoing debate about fluoride safety, with Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. claiming links to neurodevelopmental risks, while the American Dental Association maintains fluoride is safe at prescribed levels.

A recent HHS report indicated potential links between high fluoride levels and lower IQ in children, but another study warned that removing fluoride from water could increase tooth decay significantly. Despite these conflicting findings, some states have begun to ban or restrict fluoride, and Kennedy’s FDA has moved to limit fluoride supplements for children.

(Source:The Independent)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement