Costco sued over claims it raised prices, then sought tariff refunds from government

WLTX.com
Costco is facing a class action lawsuit alleging it profited by both charging customers higher prices due to tariffs and then claiming refunds when those tariffs were deemed unlawful.

Summary

A class action lawsuit filed in Seattle federal court accuses Costco of unjustly benefiting from tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The plaintiffs allege that Costco raised prices on imported goods between February 2025 and February 2026 to offset tariff costs, effectively passing those costs onto consumers. Subsequently, after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the IEEPA-based tariffs unlawful on February 20, 2026, Costco sought refunds for the same tariff costs.

The lawsuit argues that Costco is attempting to collect the same money twice – once through higher prices paid by customers and again through government refunds. Plaintiffs claim Costco has not offered to reimburse customers for the initial tariff costs, and instead, CEO Ron Vachris indicated any refunds would be used to lower prices for future shoppers. The complaint cites Costco’s public statements acknowledging the impact of tariffs on its costs and pricing decisions, as well as its own case filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade seeking tariff refunds.

The proposed class includes individuals across the United States who purchased goods from Costco during the specified period that were subject to the IEEPA tariffs. The lawsuit seeks damages for unjust enrichment, money had and received, and violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. KING 5 News has contacted Costco for a statement.

(Source:WLTX.com)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement