Payment Towards Corporate Guarantee Settlement Allowable as Deductible Business Expenditure u/s 37(1): ITAT [Read Order]

Taxscan
The ITAT ruled that a payment for settling a corporate guarantee is deductible as a business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed whether a payment made towards settling a corporate guarantee could be considered a deductible business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved Escorts Limited, which provided a guarantee to a Korean supplier (L.S. Cables, Korea) for credit extended to its US subsidiary (Farmtrac North America LLC). When the subsidiary defaulted, the guarantee was invoked, leading to arbitration and a settlement of USD 7.17 million. Escorts claimed the settlement payment as a business expense, but the Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) disallowed it, arguing it wasn’t exclusively for business purposes.

Escorts argued the guarantee was given in the ordinary course of business to support its subsidiary and promote its brand in the US. They cited precedents supporting the allowance of similar claims. The Revenue countered that a valid guarantee didn’t exist due to a lack of countersignature and questioned the expenditure’s connection to Escorts’ business, noting the subsidiary was only 75% owned.

The ITAT ruled in favor of Escorts, stating the guarantee’s validity was established through arbitration and High Court proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the tax department shouldn’t second-guess business decisions and that once a guarantee is given, the resulting liability is a legitimate business obligation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 47.64 crores was reversed, allowing Escorts to deduct the settlement payment as a business expense.

(Source:Taxscan)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement