Payment Towards Corporate Guarantee Settlement Allowable as Deductible Business Expenditure u/s 37(1): ITAT [Read Order]

Taxscan
The ITAT ruled that a payment for settling a corporate guarantee is deductible as a business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed whether a payment made towards settling a corporate guarantee could be considered a deductible business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved Escorts Limited, which provided a guarantee to a Korean supplier (L.S. Cables, Korea) for credit extended to its US subsidiary (Farmtrac North America LLC). When the subsidiary defaulted, the guarantee was invoked, leading to arbitration and a settlement of USD 7.17 million. Escorts claimed the settlement payment as a business expense, but the Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) disallowed it, arguing it wasn’t exclusively for business purposes.

Escorts argued the guarantee was given in the ordinary course of business to support its subsidiary and promote its brand in the US. They cited precedents supporting the allowance of similar claims. The Revenue countered that a valid guarantee didn’t exist due to a lack of countersignature and questioned the expenditure’s connection to Escorts’ business, noting the subsidiary was only 75% owned.

The ITAT ruled in favor of Escorts, stating the guarantee’s validity was established through arbitration and High Court proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the tax department shouldn’t second-guess business decisions and that once a guarantee is given, the resulting liability is a legitimate business obligation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 47.64 crores was reversed, allowing Escorts to deduct the settlement payment as a business expense.

(Source:Taxscan)

CBS News

Dozens of Orange County residents file lawsuit against GKN Aerospace in chemical tank incident

Newsweek

Circle K Data Breach Settlement: How to Claim Class Action Payout Before Deadline

The Verge

California sues over 23andMe breach that exposed millions of people’s data

Thestreet

Kroger forced to make costly store fix after federal lawsuit

Https://www.kfvs12.com

Hearing held on evidence in West Park Mall lawsuit; case continues

Financialcontent

Eagleview and Nearmap Reach Settlement in Patent Dispute

Businesstoday | Malaysia

QL Resources' Singapore Suit Discontinued Following Settlement

Https://www.fox10tv.com

New lawsuit filed as more customers come forward about Mobile roofing and window companies

Zipfm

California AG Rob Bonta Plans Lawsuit Against Chrome Holding Over 23andMe Data Breach

Webpronews

Paxos Secures Rare SEC Clearing Agency Status, Opening Door to Blockchain Settlement in Traditional Markets

Finanznachrichten.de

Davidovich Stone Law Group Resolves RSO Challenge and Buyer Lawsuit Together

Google News

3-year-old California girl hospitalized with acute kidney failure after eating at Costa Mesa spot amid E. coli outbreak, lawsuit claims

Punch

SEC, operators complete preparations for faster trade settlement

CP24 Toronto

Judge orders Toronto plastic surgeon to pay $21M to former patients after installing 24 cameras around clinic

The New Yorker

Taking Children from Their Parents Without a Court Order