Nike sued by consumers for not refunding tariff costs

Devdiscourse
Consumers are suing Nike for failing to refund tariff costs passed on through higher prices.

Summary

Nike was sued on Friday by consumers accusing the athletic apparel and footwear maker of not refunding tariff-related costs it passed on in the form of higher prices. In a proposed class action, consumers said Nike should not be allowed to keep "significant" refunds it can expect after the U.S. Supreme Court in February struck down sweeping tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The Beaverton, Oregon-based company has said it paid about $1 billion in tariffs on imported goods as a result of Trump's actions. Consumers said Nike raised prices on some footwear by $5 to $10 and some apparel by $2 to $10 to offset the costs. "Nike has made no legally binding commitment to return tariff-related overcharges to the consumers who actually paid them," the complaint said. "Unless restrained by this court, Nike stands to recover the same tariff payments twice — once from consumers through higher prices and again from the federal government through tariff refunds." Nike did not immediately respond to requests for comment. It joins a variety of companies including Costco and EssilorLuxottica that have been sued by consumers for allegedly failing to pass on tariff refunds to consumers. The Nike lawsuit was filed in the Portland, Oregon, federal court. In a March 31 conference call, Nike said its fiscal quarter ending in August 2026 would likely be the final quarter when tariffs are a material year-over-year headwind to gross margin.

(Source:Devdiscourse)

Decrypt

Sony Argues in Court That Digital Games Can't Be Owned

The Kingston Whig-Standard

SMK Law: Ontario Court Grants Leave and Certifies Galaxy Digital Securities Class Action

scanx.trade

Indegene gets US court preliminary approval for USD 4.72 million class action settlement

TNW

Google will pay £260m to settle a UK class action over Play Store fees

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Google News

Awful: The Aviation Herald Founder Forced To Sell Home After Slovakian Airline Lawsuit

New Telegraph

T+1 Settlement cycle On Smooth Course , Boosting Nigeria’s Market Competitiveness – SEC

Yahoo! News

What Meta’s Settlement Means for Teens and Social Media

Infostride

CSCS transitions to T+2 settlement cycle

Headtopics

Lenovo and InterDigital Reach Patent Settlement After German Sales Ban

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft