Amazon Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Trump Tariff Price Hikes

Econotimes
Amazon faces a lawsuit alleging it inflated prices due to unlawful Trump tariffs and failed to seek refunds for consumers.

Summary

Amazon.com Inc. is facing a proposed class-action lawsuit in Seattle federal court, accused of inflating product prices due to tariffs later ruled unlawful by the U.S. Supreme Court. The case centers on tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which the Supreme Court determined exceeded his executive authority. Plaintiffs claim Amazon collected hundreds of millions of dollars in added tariff-related costs from shoppers without attempting to recover those funds from the government. The lawsuit alleges that Amazon passed the higher import costs directly to consumers through increased prices on imported goods. Plaintiffs argue that ordinary consumers cannot legally request tariff refunds themselves, leaving retailers as the only possible target for financial recovery. The complaint also alleges Amazon's refusal to pursue refunds may be politically motivated, referencing reports from April 2025 claiming Amazon considered displaying how much of a product's price came from IEEPA tariffs. The reports triggered criticism from the White House and allegedly led to a direct phone call between Donald Trump and Amazon Executive Chairman Jeff Bezos. Amazon later denied it planned to display tariff charges on product listings. However, plaintiffs argue the incident demonstrates the company's desire to avoid conflict with the Trump administration by allowing the government to retain the disputed tariff revenue. The legal complaint includes claims of unjust enrichment and violations of Washington state consumer protection laws. Amazon has not publicly commented on the ongoing litigation.

(Source:Econotimes)

Decrypt

Sony Argues in Court That Digital Games Can't Be Owned

The Kingston Whig-Standard

SMK Law: Ontario Court Grants Leave and Certifies Galaxy Digital Securities Class Action

scanx.trade

Indegene gets US court preliminary approval for USD 4.72 million class action settlement

TNW

Google will pay £260m to settle a UK class action over Play Store fees

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Google News

Awful: The Aviation Herald Founder Forced To Sell Home After Slovakian Airline Lawsuit

New Telegraph

T+1 Settlement cycle On Smooth Course , Boosting Nigeria’s Market Competitiveness – SEC

Yahoo! News

What Meta’s Settlement Means for Teens and Social Media

Infostride

CSCS transitions to T+2 settlement cycle

Headtopics

Lenovo and InterDigital Reach Patent Settlement After German Sales Ban

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft