Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit

Econotimes
The Trump administration defends restricting Anthropic's AI products, arguing it acted lawfully after the company resisted Pentagon demands.

Summary

The Trump administration has defended its decision to restrict Anthropic's artificial intelligence products in a federal court filing, arguing that the government acted lawfully after the AI company resisted Pentagon demands regarding military applications of its Claude chatbot. The filing, submitted Monday in San Francisco federal court, states that government agencies moved to limit access to Anthropic's technology following disputes over national security concerns. The administration rejected allegations that it unlawfully retaliated against the company, which claims it was targeted for exercising its protected speech rights. The U.S. Department of Justice also challenged the legal basis of Anthropic's lawsuit, arguing that the case should be dismissed because the company is not contesting a "final agency action." Anthropic filed its lawsuit on March 9, accusing President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of improperly placing the company on a national security blacklist. The AI startup argues that the restrictions violate its constitutional rights, including free speech and due process protections. The dispute emerged after the Pentagon imposed a supply-chain risk designation on Anthropic, limiting government use of its AI systems. Sources familiar with the matter said the technology had been used in military-related operations involving Iran. The designation reportedly followed Anthropic's refusal to remove safeguards that prevent Claude AI from being used for autonomous weapons systems and domestic surveillance programs. On March 26, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin temporarily blocked the Pentagon's blacklisting action, providing Anthropic with a temporary legal victory while the case proceeds. The lawsuit has become a closely watched legal battle in the artificial intelligence industry, raising broader questions about government authority over AI companies and the extent to which developers can control how their technologies are deployed. Anthropic, which confidentially filed for a U.S. initial public offering on June 1, is also pursuing a separate lawsuit in Washington, D.C., challenging another Pentagon designation that could affect its eligibility for future federal contracts.

(Source:Econotimes)

Decrypt

Sony Argues in Court That Digital Games Can't Be Owned

The Kingston Whig-Standard

SMK Law: Ontario Court Grants Leave and Certifies Galaxy Digital Securities Class Action

scanx.trade

Indegene gets US court preliminary approval for USD 4.72 million class action settlement

TNW

Google will pay £260m to settle a UK class action over Play Store fees

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Google News

Awful: The Aviation Herald Founder Forced To Sell Home After Slovakian Airline Lawsuit

New Telegraph

T+1 Settlement cycle On Smooth Course , Boosting Nigeria’s Market Competitiveness – SEC

Yahoo! News

What Meta’s Settlement Means for Teens and Social Media

Infostride

CSCS transitions to T+2 settlement cycle

Headtopics

Lenovo and InterDigital Reach Patent Settlement After German Sales Ban

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft