Luxury Pasadena hotel to pay $320,000 to settle Eaton fire price-gouging lawsuit

Headtopics
The Langham Huntington Pasadena will pay $320,000 to settle allegations of price gouging during the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires.

Summary

Langham Hotels Pacific Corporation, owner of the Langham Huntington Pasadena, has agreed to pay $320,000 to settle a lawsuit involving allegations of price gouging. The settlement includes $300,000 in civil penalties and $20,000 in investigative costs to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s and Counsel’s Offices. The lawsuit alleged that the hotel violated California anti-price-gouging and unfair competition laws by charging guests more than 10 percent above regular rates during the Eaton and Palisades wildfires in early 2025.

Hotel management stated that an automated pricing tool caused unintended rate increases, which have since been reviewed and updated. The corporation noted that all affected guests have been refunded and that they donated over 1,100 complimentary room nights to support first responders and displaced residents during the crisis. As part of the settlement, the hotel must modify its automated pricing systems to prevent unlawful increases during declared states of emergency.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman criticized the hotel for profiting from the tragedy, stating it is "reprehensible to overcharge and take advantage of wildfire victims." The settlement also requires the hotel to pay restitution to eligible guests, with at least $216,000 owed for the period between January and April 2025. Any refunds that cannot be issued directly to guests will be paid to the Los Angeles County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs.

(Source:Headtopics)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement