Parag Agrawal and Ned Sehgal testify in court in Elon Musk's Twitter lawsuit

The Times Of India
Former Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal and CFO Ned Segal testified in court, disputing Elon Musk's claims about bot accounts and misleading information during the $44 billion acquisition.

Summary

Parag Agrawal and Ned Segal, former CEO and CFO of Twitter (now X), testified in court as part of an investor lawsuit against Elon Musk related to his $44 billion acquisition of the platform in 2022. Investors allege Musk made misleading statements about Twitter’s user base and bot accounts to influence the stock price. Both Agrawal and Segal refuted claims that they misled Musk regarding the composition of Twitter’s user base during deal negotiations. They stated they had limited recollection of the period leading up to Musk’s attempt to pause the acquisition.

During testimony, Agrawal questioned the logic behind Musk’s May 2022 tweet about temporarily halting the purchase, while Segal expressed displeasure with Musk’s criticism of Twitter’s bot estimation methods. They challenged Musk’s assertion that he always intended to complete the deal but was misled about spam accounts. Musk testified he was “stunned” by the lack of detail regarding bot counts during initial meetings, comparing the issue to discovering a termite infestation during a home purchase.

Agrawal and Segal countered that bots were only one of many topics discussed and weren’t initially a central concern. Following a later meeting where bots became a focus, Musk publicly claimed they comprised 20% of Twitter’s user base, prompting Agrawal to respond with Twitter’s methodology showing less than 5%. The exchange included an insulting emoji from Musk, which Agrawal said he “doesn’t remember, but it was confusing.” Previously, Agrawal and Segal had sued Musk over severance payments, reaching a confidential settlement last year.

(Source:The Times Of India)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement