Lawsuit forces tax measure ballot language change in Contra Costa County

Headtopics
A lawsuit successfully challenged the wording of a Contra Costa County sales tax measure, forcing revisions to ensure neutral language on the June ballot.

Summary

A lawsuit filed by Sandra Kallander, chair of the Libertarian Party of Contra Costa County, and another individual, successfully challenged the language used in Contra Costa County’s Measure B, a 0.625% sales tax measure set for the June ballot. The plaintiffs argued the original ballot language was persuasive and prejudicial, violating state election code requiring neutral wording. Judge Leonard E. Marquez agreed in part, ruling that descriptions of federal cuts as “deep” and local services as “critical” were argumentative and had to be removed, along with claims about preventing hospital closures and restrictions on fund usage.

The measure aims to raise approximately $150 million annually to offset potential funding reductions stemming from federal spending cuts and a projected state budget deficit. County officials expressed concerns about the potential loss of health coverage for 90,000 residents and significant reductions in funding for the county health system. However, the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association pointed out inaccuracies in the county’s funding reduction claims, prompting a supervisor to withdraw support.

While supervisors intend to use the funds to offset lost revenue and increased healthcare costs, Kallander and the Taxpayers Association note the revenue will go into the county’s general fund without restriction. A state bill to allow the county to exceed tax limits is currently in the legislature, addressing another issue raised in the lawsuit, but the judge denied the request to remove the measure from the ballot entirely.

(Source:Headtopics)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement