Conservation Groups Issue Reply to EPA in West Virginia Regional Haze Lawsuit

Clean Technica
Conservation groups filed a reply defending their lawsuit against EPA’s approval of West Virginia’s haze plan, warning it weakens Clean Air Act protections and risks air quality in parks and wilderness.

Summary

A coalition of conservation groups — the National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club, and Earthjustice — filed a response in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit defending their lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of West Virginia’s Regional Haze State Implementation Plan. The groups argue that EPA’s approval, based on a Trump-era policy change, allows West Virginia to bypass the Clean Air Act’s core requirement for reasonable progress in reducing visibility-impairing air pollution in national parks and wilderness areas. They contend the plan is unlawful because it fails to require additional controls for the state’s highest-polluting coal plants, despite the availability of affordable upgrades to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions that harm health and degrade visibility. If the court does not grant the groups’ petition, treasured sites such as Dolly Sods and Otter Creek Wilderness areas in West Virginia, as well as Shenandoah, Mammoth Cave, and Great Smoky Mountains National Parks, could face increased risks of poor air quality. The lawsuit, first filed in September 2025, marks the first legal challenge to the policy change, which the groups say rewrites the Clean Air Act and has already been used to propose approvals of inadequate haze plans in other states. Advocates emphasize that the EPA’s decision disregards decades of agency precedent and undermines protections for parks and downwind communities, while state and industry representatives argue the plan is sufficient.

(Source:Clean Technica)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement