Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase, absolves him of some fraud claims

Santa Rosa Press Democrat
A jury found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors about Twitter’s stock price before his acquisition, awarding $2.6 billion in damages, but cleared him of actively scheming to defraud.

Summary

A jury in San Francisco has determined that Elon Musk is liable for defrauding investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the months leading up to his $44 billion acquisition of the company in 2022. The civil trial centered on whether Musk’s tweets and podcast comments in May 2022 intentionally misled shareholders, causing them to sell their shares at a loss. While the jury found Musk liable for misleading investors with two specific tweets – including one stating the deal was “temporarily on hold” – they absolved him of intentionally scheming to defraud investors and found no wrongdoing in a statement made on a podcast.

The jury awarded shareholders approximately $2.1 billion in stock damages and $500 million in options. Plaintiffs’ attorney Joseph Cotchett hailed the verdict as a victory for investors and a demonstration that even wealthy individuals are subject to the law. Musk’s legal team, however, plans to appeal, citing previous victories and characterizing the verdict as a “bump in the road.”

The trial heavily focused on Musk’s claims regarding the number of bot accounts on Twitter, which he alleged were significantly higher than the 5% disclosed by the company. Musk used this claim as justification for attempting to back out of the purchase agreement, ultimately leading to a court battle in Delaware before he agreed to proceed with the original deal. The core question was whether Musk’s statements were a deliberate attempt to depress Twitter’s share price, and while the jury found misleading statements were made, they did not find evidence of a deliberate scheme.

(Source:Santa Rosa Press Democrat)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement