Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase, absolves him of some fraud claims

Santa Rosa Press Democrat
A jury found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors about Twitter’s stock price before his acquisition, awarding $2.6 billion in damages, but cleared him of actively scheming to defraud.

Summary

A jury in San Francisco has determined that Elon Musk is liable for defrauding investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the months leading up to his $44 billion acquisition of the company in 2022. The civil trial centered on whether Musk’s tweets and podcast comments in May 2022 intentionally misled shareholders, causing them to sell their shares at a loss. While the jury found Musk liable for misleading investors with two specific tweets – including one stating the deal was “temporarily on hold” – they absolved him of intentionally scheming to defraud investors and found no wrongdoing in a statement made on a podcast.

The jury awarded shareholders approximately $2.1 billion in stock damages and $500 million in options. Plaintiffs’ attorney Joseph Cotchett hailed the verdict as a victory for investors and a demonstration that even wealthy individuals are subject to the law. Musk’s legal team, however, plans to appeal, citing previous victories and characterizing the verdict as a “bump in the road.”

The trial heavily focused on Musk’s claims regarding the number of bot accounts on Twitter, which he alleged were significantly higher than the 5% disclosed by the company. Musk used this claim as justification for attempting to back out of the purchase agreement, ultimately leading to a court battle in Delaware before he agreed to proceed with the original deal. The core question was whether Musk’s statements were a deliberate attempt to depress Twitter’s share price, and while the jury found misleading statements were made, they did not find evidence of a deliberate scheme.

(Source:Santa Rosa Press Democrat)

The Manila Times

Apple wins dismissal of lawsuit over child sexual abuse material on iCloud

Financial Post

RBC agrees to pay $45 million to settle trailer fee class action

The Hindu

Why are five anonymous female users suing Elon Musk’s xAI? | Explained

TNW

Apple wins dismissal of iCloud child abuse imagery lawsuit on Section 230 grounds

Witn

State to receive $666K in 23andMe settlement over 2023 data breach

New York Post

WGA filing lawsuit to block Paramount's $81B WBD merger in latest acquisition challenge

The Black Chronicle

Spokane eyes $940K public defender grant as county faces lawsuit over caseloads

Hampton Roads Messenger

$45 Million Settlement Announced Over Cash App Deceptive Practices

Kbzk News

FTC Right-to-repair settlement follows years of advocacy in Montana

Zerohedge

Meta Used AI To Lay Off Workers With Medical Conditions: Lawsuit

ABC17News.com

Judge dismisses lawsuit against Apple over alleged child sexual abuse material on iCloud

9to5Mac

Judge dismisses lawsuit accusing Apple of failing to stop CSAM on iCloud

Devdiscourse

U.S. Judge Shields Apple from Class Action Over iCloud Exploitation Claims | Law-Order

Wkyt

Another FCPS employee files lawsuit, claims retaliation after raising concerns over finances

Los Angeles Herald

California-led lawsuit challenges Paramount-Warner merger